Immigrants from Lithuania vs Icelander In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,668,800 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016 and weighted average of 65.6%, a difference of 0.040%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Lithuania	Icelander
Minimum	57.7%	39.9%
Maximum	72.8%	74.5%
Range	15.1%	34.6%
Mean	65.3%	57.1%
Median	65.2%	56.8%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	63.5%	50.4%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	67.3%	65.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	3.8%	14.6%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.1%	8.5%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.1%	8.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Lithuania and Icelanders by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Costa Rican (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Guatemalan (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Argentina (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Guatemala (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Philippines (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Ecuadorian (65.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (65.7%, a difference of 0.030%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
Immigrants \| Ecuador	95.9 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Iraq	95.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 65.7%
Iraqis	95.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 65.7%
Norwegians	95.3 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 65.7%
Koreans	95.3 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 65.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 65.7%
Ecuadorians	94.7 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	94.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 65.6%
Icelanders	94.3 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	94.1 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	93.5 /100 \| #133	Exceptional 65.6%
Costa Ricans	93.2 /100 \| #134	Exceptional 65.6%
Guatemalans	92.5 /100 \| #135	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Argentina	92.4 /100 \| #136	Exceptional 65.6%
Guamanians/Chamorros	92.4 /100 \| #137	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| West Indies	92.0 /100 \| #138	Exceptional 65.6%
Immigrants \| Taiwan	90.8 /100 \| #139	Exceptional 65.5%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	90.8 /100 \| #140	Exceptional 65.5%
Samoans	90.5 /100 \| #141	Exceptional 65.5%
Indians (Asian)	89.5 /100 \| #142	Excellent 65.5%