Latvian vs Icelander No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Latvian
Icelander
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Latvians
Icelanders
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
90.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Icelander No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,382,965 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.015 and weighted average of 9.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,468,771 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068 and weighted average of 9.6%, a difference of 1.7%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Icelander |
Minimum | 0.54% | 0.55% |
Maximum | 28.8% | 17.9% |
Range | 28.3% | 17.4% |
Mean | 7.0% | 4.9% |
Median | 5.3% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 2.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 3.4% |
Demographics Similar to Latvians and Icelanders by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Immigrants from South Africa (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Cameroon (9.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Kenya (9.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Syria (9.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Korea (9.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |