Immigrants from Chile vs Filipino In Labor Force | Age > 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,647,266 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 65.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,350,604 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.535 and weighted average of 65.9%, a difference of 0.030%.

In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Chile	Filipino
Minimum	29.8%	38.4%
Maximum	73.3%	73.7%
Range	43.5%	35.3%
Mean	60.1%	62.6%
Median	64.2%	63.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	55.0%	59.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	66.1%	66.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.1%	7.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	10.5%	5.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	10.3%	5.5%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile and Filipinos by In Labor Force | Age > 16

In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Immigrants from Australia (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Okinawan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (65.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and Bangladeshi (65.9%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Bangladeshi (65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cambodia (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Uruguay (66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Okinawan (65.9%, a difference of 0.050%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age > 16
South American Indians	99.4 /100 \| #87	Exceptional 66.0%
Bermudans	99.3 /100 \| #88	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| Laos	99.2 /100 \| #89	Exceptional 66.0%
Chileans	99.2 /100 \| #90	Exceptional 66.0%
Iranians	99.2 /100 \| #91	Exceptional 66.0%
Aleuts	99.1 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| South America	99.1 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| Cambodia	99.1 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 66.0%
Immigrants \| Uruguay	99.1 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 66.0%
Bangladeshis	98.9 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 65.9%
Filipinos	98.9 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Chile	98.7 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	98.7 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 65.9%
Okinawans	98.7 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Colombia	98.6 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 65.9%
Uruguayans	98.6 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	98.5 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 65.9%
Palestinians	98.5 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 65.9%
Colombians	98.4 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 65.9%
Immigrants \| Serbia	98.1 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 65.8%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.1 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 65.8%