Crow vs Yup'ik In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Crow
Yup'ik
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Crow
Yup'ik
75.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
76.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Yup'ik In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,195,148 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 75.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,955,803 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251 and weighted average of 76.4%, a difference of 0.68%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 32.4% | 32.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.6% | 67.2% |
Mean | 69.1% | 76.1% |
Median | 76.8% | 78.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.7% | 67.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.1% | 84.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.4% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Yup'ik by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 2.4%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.87%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 1.1%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 1.7%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Ute (78.9%, a difference of 3.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |