Crow vs Seminole In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Crow
Seminole
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Crow
Seminole
75.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
326th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Seminole In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,195,148 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 75.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,296,286 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Seminole and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 80.8%, a difference of 6.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Seminole |
Minimum | 32.4% | 33.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 67.6% | 66.7% |
Mean | 69.1% | 78.4% |
Median | 76.8% | 80.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.7% | 68.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.1% | 85.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.4% | 17.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Seminole by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Colville (80.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.60%), Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.60%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and Houma (79.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 80.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |