Ute vs Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Ute
Lumbee
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Ute
Lumbee
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
77.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Lumbee In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,461 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 77.3%, a difference of 2.2%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 23.7% | 42.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.3% | 57.9% |
| Mean | 73.4% | 80.3% |
| Median | 75.4% | 79.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 70.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 86.0% | 97.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.3% | 27.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.0% | 15.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.6% | 15.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Lumbee by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.23%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and Crow (75.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |