Creek vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Creek
 Alaskan Athabascan
 In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Creek
Alaskan Athabascans
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
82.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
311th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Alaskan Athabascan In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,727 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178 and weighted average of 80.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,810,545 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109 and weighted average of 82.3%, a difference of 2.0%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Alaskan Athabascan | 
| Minimum | 30.0% | 39.3% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 70.0% | 60.7% | 
| Mean | 77.0% | 85.8% | 
| Median | 78.8% | 89.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.3% | 78.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.8% | 100.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 21.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 17.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 17.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Creek and Alaskan Athabascans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Ute (80.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Dutch West Indian (81.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and Houma (81.2%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Osage (82.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Hispanic or Latino (82.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Central America (82.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Yaqui (82.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Cherokee (82.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | 
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 82.4% | 
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 82.3% | 
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 82.2% | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 82.1% | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 82.0% | 
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 81.9% | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 81.7% | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 81.6% | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% |