Creek vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability
COMPARE
Creek
Alaskan Athabascan
Disability
Disability Comparison
Creek
Alaskan Athabascans
15.6%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
343rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Alaskan Athabascan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,460,797 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,821,092 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 14.4%, a difference of 8.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 4.4% |
| Maximum | 35.3% | 41.9% |
| Range | 26.7% | 37.5% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 18.3% |
| Median | 20.2% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 13.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.5% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.1% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 8.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 8.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Alaskan Athabascans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 0.47%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Pueblo (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Navajo (14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 17.1% |