Creek vs Paiute In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Creek
 Paiute
 In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Creek
Paiute
80.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
328th/ 347
METRIC RANK
78.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Paiute In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,425,727 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.178 and weighted average of 80.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,387,082 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Paiute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.240 and weighted average of 78.1%, a difference of 3.3%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Paiute | 
| Minimum | 30.0% | 27.3% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% | 
| Range | 70.0% | 72.7% | 
| Mean | 77.0% | 71.1% | 
| Median | 78.8% | 75.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 73.3% | 56.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.8% | 83.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 26.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.1% | 21.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.0% | 21.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Creek and Paiute by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Yakama (80.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Ute (80.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Puerto Rican (80.4%, a difference of 0.34%), Choctaw (81.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and Cheyenne (80.3%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Paiute are Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 0.16%), Lumbee (78.3%, a difference of 0.28%), Crow (78.6%, a difference of 0.65%), Tohono O'odham (77.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Pueblo (77.5%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 81.2% | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 81.1% | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 81.0% | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.8% | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.7% | 
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.6% | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.4% | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 80.3% | 
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.3% | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 78.6% | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 78.3% | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 78.2% | 
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.1% | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.5% | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.5% | 
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.6% | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 76.5% |