Immigrants from Oceania vs Subsaharan African In Labor Force | Age 16-19

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,018,730 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 37.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 506,892,263 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.404 and weighted average of 38.4%, a difference of 1.4%.

In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Oceania	Subsaharan African
Minimum	7.3%	19.0%
Maximum	100.0%	69.1%
Range	92.7%	50.1%
Mean	44.3%	40.9%
Median	40.9%	39.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	37.3%	37.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	50.0%	44.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	12.7%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.5%	7.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.2%	7.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Sub-Saharan Africans by In Labor Force | Age 16-19

In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Austria (37.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (38.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Spaniard (38.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (38.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and New Zealander (38.0%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Hawaiian (38.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Scotland (38.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and Chickasaw (38.3%, a difference of 0.30%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	In Labor Force \| Age 16-19
Immigrants \| Scotland	98.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 38.5%
Sub-Saharan Africans	98.3 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 38.4%
Hawaiians	98.2 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 38.4%
Bulgarians	97.9 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 38.3%
Colville	97.9 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 38.3%
Chickasaw	97.8 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 38.3%
Immigrants \| Nepal	97.8 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 38.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	97.8 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 38.3%
Ukrainians	97.6 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 38.3%
Ethiopians	97.4 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 38.2%
Guamanians/Chamorros	97.4 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 38.2%
Seminole	96.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| England	96.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 38.1%
Immigrants \| Africa	96.1 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 38.0%
Africans	95.6 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 38.0%
Choctaw	95.6 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 38.0%
New Zealanders	95.6 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 38.0%
Spaniards	95.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	95.4 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 38.0%
Immigrants \| Austria	95.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 37.9%
Immigrants \| Oceania	94.7 /100 \| #132	Exceptional 37.9%