Tlingit-Haida vs Chippewa Family Households
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Chippewa
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Chippewa
61.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Chippewa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,548 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.070 and weighted average of 61.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,001,181 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 0.77%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Chippewa |
Minimum | 41.2% | 25.0% |
Maximum | 80.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 38.8% | 75.0% |
Mean | 62.4% | 65.2% |
Median | 63.4% | 63.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.0% | 57.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.2% | 70.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.2% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Chippewa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Alsatian (61.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ugandan (61.7%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), African (62.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Bermudan (62.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 62.2% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |