Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Comanche Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Comanche
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Comanche
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
247th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Comanche Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,723,370 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.019 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,767,909 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 0.11%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Uzbekistan | Comanche |
| Minimum | 40.8% | 47.4% |
| Maximum | 91.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 50.4% | 52.6% |
| Mean | 66.4% | 69.1% |
| Median | 66.7% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.9% | 63.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.7% | 73.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Comanche by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Ghana (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Dominican (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Russian (63.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Eastern European (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Dominica (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
| Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
| Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |