Sioux vs Ghanaian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Sioux
Ghanaian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Sioux
Ghanaians
41.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
285th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Ghanaian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,109,143 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.639 and weighted average of 41.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,506,796 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 42.2%, a difference of 1.8%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sioux | Ghanaian |
Minimum | 3.8% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 73.2% | 82.9% |
Range | 69.4% | 66.7% |
Mean | 38.1% | 45.7% |
Median | 40.9% | 44.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.5% | 39.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 51.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 10.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Ghanaians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (41.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Belizean (42.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Eritrea (42.1%, a difference of 0.33%), Sudanese (42.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and Honduran (42.1%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.0% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |