Sioux vs Zimbabwean Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Sioux
Zimbabwean
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Sioux
Zimbabweans
41.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
305th/ 347
METRIC RANK
47.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
89.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Zimbabwean Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,109,143 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.639 and weighted average of 41.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,192,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082 and weighted average of 47.4%, a difference of 14.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sioux | Zimbabwean |
Minimum | 3.8% | 25.7% |
Maximum | 73.2% | 84.6% |
Range | 69.4% | 58.9% |
Mean | 38.1% | 51.5% |
Median | 40.9% | 49.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.5% | 43.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.7% | 59.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.3% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.3% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Subsaharan African (41.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Guyanese (41.4%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Venezuela (47.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Australian (47.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Pakistani (47.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Okinawan (47.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Celtic (47.3%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
French Canadians | 92.4 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Immigrants | Germany | 92.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Chileans | 92.2 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 47.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 90.5 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Okinawans | 90.1 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 47.4% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.3 /100 | #123 | Excellent 47.4% |
Zimbabweans | 89.2 /100 | #124 | Excellent 47.4% |
Australians | 89.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 47.4% |
Pakistanis | 88.6 /100 | #126 | Excellent 47.3% |
Celtics | 88.1 /100 | #127 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 87.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 87.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 47.3% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 87.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |