Immigrants from Oceania vs Indian (Asian) Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Indian (Asian)
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Indians (Asian)
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Indian (Asian) Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,783,710 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Indians (Asian) and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.313 and weighted average of 65.1%, a difference of 0.35%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Indian (Asian) |
| Minimum | 8.8% | 36.8% |
| Maximum | 91.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.6% | 63.2% |
| Mean | 64.5% | 68.4% |
| Median | 67.1% | 68.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 63.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 76.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Indians (Asian) by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Ecuadorian (65.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Iraq (65.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indians (Asian) are Spaniard (65.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Chilean (65.2%, a difference of 0.040%), English (65.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and White/Caucasian (65.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Chileans | 98.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 65.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 98.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 97.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Spaniards | 97.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| English | 97.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Alaska Natives | 97.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |