Immigrants from Oceania vs Cherokee Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Cherokee
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Cherokee
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
95.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cherokee Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,389,085 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.567 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,383,151 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 65.0%, a difference of 0.080%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 8.8% | 31.0% |
| Maximum | 91.4% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.6% | 69.0% |
| Mean | 64.5% | 69.9% |
| Median | 67.1% | 67.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.7% | 64.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.6% | 72.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.4% | 11.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.2% | 11.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Cherokee by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Choctaw (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Iraq (65.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Ecuadorian (65.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Dutch (64.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Argentinean (65.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (64.9%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Palestinians | 97.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 65.1% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 96.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Scandinavians | 96.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Europeans | 96.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 96.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |