Immigrants from Oceania vs Cherokee Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Cherokee
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Cherokee
11.2%
MALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
MALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Cherokee Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,340,172 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159 and weighted average of 11.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,122,545 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 17.0%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Cherokee |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 23.0% | 54.2% |
| Range | 20.0% | 50.6% |
| Mean | 12.3% | 17.8% |
| Median | 12.1% | 16.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.2% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 7.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 7.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Pennsylvania German (11.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (11.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Uruguayan (11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Celtic (11.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and South American (11.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Hungarians | 55.1 /100 | #167 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Portugal | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 54.2 /100 | #169 | Average 11.1% |
| South Americans | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 11.1% |
| Uruguayans | 51.0 /100 | #171 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 50.7 /100 | #172 | Average 11.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 50.5 /100 | #173 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 11.2% |
| Celtics | 47.5 /100 | #175 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 46.0 /100 | #176 | Average 11.2% |
| Lebanese | 45.6 /100 | #177 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 40.3 /100 | #179 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 40.1 /100 | #180 | Average 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 39.5 /100 | #181 | Fair 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Ottawa (13.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (13.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Spanish American Indian (13.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (13.1%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.9% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |