Immigrants from Latin America vs Chinese Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Chinese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Chinese
67.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
68.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Chinese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 558,036,504 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.437 and weighted average of 67.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145 and weighted average of 68.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Chinese |
Minimum | 45.7% | 47.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.6% |
Range | 54.3% | 35.1% |
Mean | 70.6% | 68.6% |
Median | 70.9% | 69.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 65.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 74.5% | 73.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.5% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.5% | 7.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Chinese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Immigrants from Peru (67.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (67.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Thai (67.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and Nicaraguan (67.4%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Vietnam (68.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (68.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cuba (68.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Taiwan (68.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and Samoan (67.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |