Chinese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Married-couple Households

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,654,857 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292 and weighted average of 41.8%, a difference of 20.4%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Immigrants from Middle Africa
Minimum	35.3%	34.6%
Maximum	63.0%	62.9%
Range	27.8%	28.4%
Mean	50.6%	42.8%
Median	51.0%	41.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	46.3%	38.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	56.2%	45.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	9.9%	7.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	7.4%	6.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	7.4%	6.1%

Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households

Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Thais	100.0 /100 \| #3	Exceptional 51.9%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	100.0 /100 \| #4	Exceptional 51.8%
Tongans	100.0 /100 \| #5	Exceptional 51.6%
Danes	100.0 /100 \| #6	Exceptional 51.1%
Filipinos	100.0 /100 \| #7	Exceptional 51.0%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #8	Exceptional 50.6%
Pennsylvania Germans	100.0 /100 \| #9	Exceptional 50.4%
Chinese	100.0 /100 \| #10	Exceptional 50.4%
Immigrants \| Pakistan	100.0 /100 \| #11	Exceptional 50.1%
Swiss	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 49.9%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 49.9%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 49.8%
Koreans	99.9 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 49.7%
Swedes	99.9 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 49.7%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	99.9 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 49.6%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Married-couple Households

In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Arapaho (41.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Sudan (41.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-couple Households
Paiute	0.0 /100 \| #291	Tragic 42.1%
Indonesians	0.0 /100 \| #292	Tragic 42.0%
Menominee	0.0 /100 \| #293	Tragic 42.0%
Immigrants \| Yemen	0.0 /100 \| #294	Tragic 42.0%
Kiowa	0.0 /100 \| #295	Tragic 42.0%
Immigrants \| Sudan	0.0 /100 \| #296	Tragic 41.9%
Arapaho	0.0 /100 \| #297	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	0.0 /100 \| #298	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Ghana	0.0 /100 \| #299	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Belize	0.0 /100 \| #300	Tragic 41.8%
Immigrants \| Bahamas	0.0 /100 \| #301	Tragic 41.7%
Immigrants \| Honduras	0.0 /100 \| #302	Tragic 41.6%
Sub-Saharan Africans	0.0 /100 \| #303	Tragic 41.6%
Immigrants \| Guyana	0.0 /100 \| #304	Tragic 41.6%
Sioux	0.0 /100 \| #305	Tragic 41.5%