Ottawa vs Taiwanese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ottawa
Taiwanese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ottawa
Taiwanese
45.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
19.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
23.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
193rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ottawa vs Taiwanese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,944,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373 and weighted average of 45.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,715,954 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222 and weighted average of 45.9%, a difference of 0.23%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ottawa | Taiwanese |
Minimum | 34.7% | 20.6% |
Maximum | 85.7% | 74.9% |
Range | 51.0% | 54.3% |
Mean | 52.3% | 47.4% |
Median | 50.5% | 46.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.7% | 38.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 58.6% | 54.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.9% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 13.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Ottawa and Taiwanese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Cambodian (45.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Chickasaw (45.9%, a difference of 0.19%), Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Carpatho Rusyn (45.7%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Mexican American Indian (45.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Chickasaw (45.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (46.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from South America (45.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Choctaw (46.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Brazilians | 35.9 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.2% |
Albanians | 31.1 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.1% |
Fijians | 29.2 /100 | #187 | Fair 46.1% |
South American Indians | 28.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 26.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 25.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 46.0% |
Choctaw | 24.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 46.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 24.6 /100 | #192 | Fair 46.0% |
Taiwanese | 23.4 /100 | #193 | Fair 45.9% |
Mexican American Indians | 23.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 45.9% |
Chickasaw | 22.7 /100 | #195 | Fair 45.9% |
Immigrants | South America | 22.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 45.9% |
Cambodians | 21.3 /100 | #197 | Fair 45.9% |
Ottawa | 19.4 /100 | #198 | Poor 45.8% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 15.7 /100 | #199 | Poor 45.7% |
Potawatomi | 15.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 15.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 45.7% |
Immigrants | Central America | 14.2 /100 | #202 | Poor 45.7% |
Alaska Natives | 13.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 45.6% |
Aleuts | 12.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 45.6% |
Nepalese | 11.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 45.6% |