Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Average Family Size
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Middle Africa
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
82.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,723 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 3.25. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,632,157 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082 and weighted average of 3.25, a difference of 0.040%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Middle Africa |
| Minimum | 1.75 | 2.55 |
| Maximum | 4.49 | 3.89 |
| Range | 2.74 | 1.34 |
| Mean | 3.36 | 3.32 |
| Median | 3.32 | 3.25 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.15 | 3.21 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.60 | 3.43 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.45 | 0.21 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.44 | 0.23 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.44 | 0.23 |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Middle Africa by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), and Tsimshian (3.25, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Comanche (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Cuban (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), and Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| Laotians | 88.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 87.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Costa Ricans | 86.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Bhutanese | 81.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Tsimshian | 80.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Armenians | 78.2 /100 | #145 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Africa | 77.9 /100 | #146 | Good 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 75.7 /100 | #147 | Good 3.24 |
| Blackfeet | 75.0 /100 | #148 | Good 3.24 |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 73.8 /100 | #149 | Good 3.24 |
| Indians (Asian) | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 3.24 |