Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Average Family Size
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Costa Rica
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Costa Rica
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.26
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
90.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,723 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 3.25. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,251,224 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 3.26, a difference of 0.37%.
Average Family Size Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Costa Rica |
| Minimum | 1.75 | 2.63 |
| Maximum | 4.49 | 3.78 |
| Range | 2.74 | 1.15 |
| Mean | 3.36 | 3.20 |
| Median | 3.32 | 3.21 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.15 | 2.99 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.60 | 3.35 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.45 | 0.36 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.44 | 0.27 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.44 | 0.27 |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), and Tsimshian (3.25, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Immigrants from Syria (3.26, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cuba (3.26, a difference of 0.030%), Colombian (3.26, a difference of 0.040%), South American Indian (3.26, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (3.26, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
| South American Indians | 91.6 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 91.3 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.7 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Syria | 90.6 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 3.26 |
| Colombians | 89.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 88.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Laotians | 88.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 87.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Costa Ricans | 86.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 86.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 3.26 |
| Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Bhutanese | 81.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 3.25 |
| Tsimshian | 80.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 3.25 |