Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Africa Average Family Size
COMPARE
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Africa
Average Family Size
Average Family Size Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Africa
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
81.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.25
AVERAGE FAMILY SIZE
77.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Africa Average Family Size Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,147,723 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 3.25. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 468,951,664 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa and average family size in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035 and weighted average of 3.25, a difference of 0.090%.

Average Family Size Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Africa |
Minimum | 1.75 | 2.05 |
Maximum | 4.49 | 4.66 |
Range | 2.74 | 2.61 |
Mean | 3.36 | 3.35 |
Median | 3.32 | 3.32 |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.15 | 3.23 |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.60 | 3.45 |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.45 | 0.23 |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.44 | 0.40 |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.44 | 0.40 |
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese and Immigrants from Africa by Average Family Size
In terms of average family size, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Venezuelan (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), Subsaharan African (3.25, a difference of 0.020%), and Tsimshian (3.25, a difference of 0.020%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Africa are Armenian (3.25, a difference of 0.010%), Tsimshian (3.25, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (3.24, a difference of 0.060%), Blackfeet (3.24, a difference of 0.070%), and Liberian (3.25, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Average Family Size |
Africans | 84.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 3.25 |
Panamanians | 84.2 /100 | #135 | Excellent 3.25 |
Comanche | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 3.25 |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 82.4 /100 | #137 | Excellent 3.25 |
Cubans | 81.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 3.25 |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 81.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 3.25 |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 81.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 3.25 |
Venezuelans | 81.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 3.25 |
Liberians | 81.2 /100 | #142 | Excellent 3.25 |
Bhutanese | 81.0 /100 | #143 | Excellent 3.25 |
Tsimshian | 80.2 /100 | #144 | Excellent 3.25 |
Armenians | 78.2 /100 | #145 | Good 3.25 |
Immigrants | Africa | 77.9 /100 | #146 | Good 3.25 |
Immigrants | Jordan | 75.7 /100 | #147 | Good 3.24 |
Blackfeet | 75.0 /100 | #148 | Good 3.24 |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 73.8 /100 | #149 | Good 3.24 |
Indians (Asian) | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 3.24 |
Jordanians | 73.5 /100 | #151 | Good 3.24 |
Spanish Americans | 72.5 /100 | #152 | Good 3.24 |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 71.4 /100 | #153 | Good 3.24 |
Immigrants | Egypt | 70.0 /100 | #154 | Good 3.24 |