Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Immigrants from El Salvador
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Immigrants from El Salvador
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
64th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from El Salvador Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,763,756 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.510 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Immigrants from El Salvador |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 4.5% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 17.7% |
| Range | 14.6% | 13.2% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 10.4% |
| Median | 11.3% | 10.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Immigrants from El Salvador by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Inupiat (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from South America (11.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (11.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Sri Lankan (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Salvadoran (11.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from France (11.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.9 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.9 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Salvadorans | 99.8 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.5% |