Zimbabwean vs Inupiat Female Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Inupiat
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Inupiat
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
50th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Inupiat Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,332,490 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.24%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Zimbabwean | Inupiat |
Minimum | 5.7% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 20.3% | 30.3% |
Range | 14.6% | 26.9% |
Mean | 11.3% | 11.8% |
Median | 11.3% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 13.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Inupiat by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Inupiat are Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Mongolians | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |