Zimbabwean vs Bulgarian Female Disability
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Bulgarian
Female Disability
Female Disability Comparison
Zimbabweans
Bulgarians
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.3%
FEMALE DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Bulgarian Female Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,206,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,628,726 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and percentage of females with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 11.3%, a difference of 0.55%.
Female Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Bulgarian |
| Minimum | 5.7% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 20.3% | 29.3% |
| Range | 14.6% | 27.2% |
| Mean | 11.3% | 11.7% |
| Median | 11.3% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.5% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Bulgarians by Female Disability
In terms of female disability, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Jordanian (11.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Tongan (11.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Sweden (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Peruvian (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Peru (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (11.4%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Disability |
| Paraguayans | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Jordanians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Peruvians | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Taiwanese | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| South Americans | 99.9 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 99.9 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.9 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.9 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 11.4% |