Yup'ik vs Kiowa Disability Age 65 to 74
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Kiowa
Disability Age 65 to 74
Disability Age 65 to 74 Comparison
Yup'ik
Kiowa
37.8%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
32.6%
DISABILITY AGE 65 TO 74
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Kiowa Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,932,947 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252 and weighted average of 37.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,067,785 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 65 and 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.141 and weighted average of 32.6%, a difference of 16.2%.
Disability Age 65 to 74 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Kiowa |
Minimum | 16.9% | 11.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.6% |
Range | 83.1% | 70.9% |
Mean | 46.4% | 40.1% |
Median | 44.8% | 35.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.1% | 30.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.8% | 47.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.8% | 17.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.1% | 16.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.0% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Kiowa by Disability Age 65 to 74
In terms of disability age 65 to 74, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Pima (38.6%, a difference of 2.0%), Tohono O'odham (36.0%, a difference of 5.0%), Inupiat (34.5%, a difference of 9.6%), Navajo (33.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 14.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Lumbee (32.7%, a difference of 0.52%), Alaskan Athabascan (32.4%, a difference of 0.62%), Houma (32.3%, a difference of 0.81%), Tsimshian (32.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and Pueblo (33.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 65 to 74 |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 30.0% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 30.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 30.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 30.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 30.4% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 30.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 30.6% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 31.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 31.5% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 32.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 32.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 32.6% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 32.7% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 32.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 33.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 33.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 34.5% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 37.8% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 38.6% |