Yugoslavian vs Bermudan Disability
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
 Bermudan
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Yugoslavians
Bermudans
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.3%
DISABILITY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
252nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Bermudan Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,695,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,721,549 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Bermudans and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498 and weighted average of 12.3%, a difference of 0.44%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Bermudan | 
| Minimum | 2.0% | 3.7% | 
| Maximum | 33.8% | 31.6% | 
| Range | 31.8% | 27.9% | 
| Mean | 13.9% | 13.4% | 
| Median | 12.6% | 12.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 14.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 5.4% | 
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Bermudans by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and British (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bermudans are Subsaharan African (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| German Russians | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 12.3% | 
| Slovenes | 0.6 /100 | #255 | Tragic 12.4% | 
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.6 /100 | #256 | Tragic 12.4% |