Yugoslavian vs Swiss Disability
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Swiss
Disability
Disability Comparison
Yugoslavians
Swiss
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
241st/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
DISABILITY
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Swiss Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,695,841 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.168 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,998,318 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.003 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.15%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Swiss |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 2.7% |
| Maximum | 33.8% | 40.6% |
| Range | 31.8% | 37.9% |
| Mean | 13.9% | 12.9% |
| Median | 12.6% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.1% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.8% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.8% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Swiss by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Hungarian (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Polish (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Norwegian (12.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and British (12.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Liberian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Indonesian (12.2%, a difference of 0.030%), British (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Basque (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), and Guamanian/Chamorro (12.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Bahamians | 2.3 /100 | #233 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Japanese | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yup'ik | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Chinese | 2.0 /100 | #236 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 1.9 /100 | #237 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Norwegians | 1.9 /100 | #238 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swedes | 1.8 /100 | #239 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Hungarians | 1.7 /100 | #240 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 1.7 /100 | #241 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Poles | 1.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 12.2% |
| British | 1.5 /100 | #243 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Basques | 1.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Liberians | 1.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Swiss | 1.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Indonesians | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 12.2% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 1.4 /100 | #248 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Europeans | 1.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Bermudans | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 12.3% |
| Belgians | 0.8 /100 | #253 | Tragic 12.3% |