Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Immigrants from Australia
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Bahamas
Immigrants from Australia
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,634,972 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.93% |
| Maximum | 7.0% | 21.9% |
| Range | 6.5% | 21.0% |
| Mean | 3.0% | 5.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.1% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Australia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Poland (2.9%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |