Choctaw vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Choctaw
Immigrants from Australia
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Choctaw
Immigrants from Australia
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
67.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Australia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,646,224 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 227,168,365 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 54.5%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Choctaw | Immigrants from Australia |
| Minimum | 1.9% | 0.93% |
| Maximum | 22.4% | 21.9% |
| Range | 20.4% | 21.0% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 5.0% |
| Median | 7.4% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.0% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.5% | 6.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.6% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.1% | 3.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.1% | 3.9% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and Tsimshian (4.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |