Uruguayan vs Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Uruguayan
Lumbee
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Uruguayans
Lumbee
10.2%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Uruguayan vs Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,764,397 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 10.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 17.6%, a difference of 72.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Uruguayan | Lumbee |
Minimum | 3.7% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 42.9% | 48.5% |
Range | 39.1% | 44.2% |
Mean | 14.9% | 22.1% |
Median | 11.4% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.0% | 25.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Uruguayans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Chilean (10.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Afghan (10.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (10.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Europe (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and Nicaraguan (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Russians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Sri Lankans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 99.1 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 99.1 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Nicaraguans | 99.1 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Chileans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Uruguayans | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Afghans | 98.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.9 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 98.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.7 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Chinese | 98.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 98.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |