Slavic vs Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Slavic
Lumbee
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Slavs
Lumbee
11.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
15.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,786,875 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.653 and weighted average of 11.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 17.6%, a difference of 51.4%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Lumbee |
| Minimum | 2.3% | 4.3% |
| Maximum | 90.1% | 48.5% |
| Range | 87.9% | 44.2% |
| Mean | 16.7% | 22.1% |
| Median | 12.0% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.5% | 25.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.9% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.8% | 7.7% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Slavs by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Native Hawaiian (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Ghanaian (11.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Nigerian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Guatemalan (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and British (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
| Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
| Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |
| British | 17.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.6% |
| Nigerians | 16.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.6% |
| Slavs | 15.5 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 14.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.7% |
| Ghanaians | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.7% |
| Guatemalans | 14.6 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.7% |
| Europeans | 13.5 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.7% |
| Belgians | 13.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.7% |
| Canadians | 13.0 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 11.8 /100 | #212 | Poor 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |