Alaskan Athabascan vs Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Lumbee
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Lumbee
15.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Lumbee Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,816,251 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.256 and weighted average of 15.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,257,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 17.6%, a difference of 12.2%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Lumbee |
Minimum | 1.9% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 52.2% | 48.5% |
Range | 50.3% | 44.2% |
Mean | 21.7% | 22.1% |
Median | 19.5% | 21.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.5% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.4% | 25.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 7.7% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Lumbee by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Yuman (15.8%, a difference of 0.55%), Dutch West Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.59%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 0.75%), Seminole (15.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and Menominee (15.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 4.2%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 4.5%), Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 5.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |