Ugandan vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Jordan
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,015,951 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.33%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 0.45% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 9.4% | 6.7% |
| Range | 9.0% | 6.3% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 2.9% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.1% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 0.98% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |