Armenian vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Armenian
Immigrants from Jordan
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Armenians
Immigrants from Jordan
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
56.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
172nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
140th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Armenian vs Immigrants from Jordan Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 310,889,694 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.152 and weighted average of 3.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,270,296 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.229 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 3.4%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Armenian | Immigrants from Jordan |
| Minimum | 0.86% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 16.4% | 6.7% |
| Range | 15.5% | 6.3% |
| Mean | 3.9% | 2.9% |
| Median | 3.1% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.8% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.92% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 0.99% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.9% | 0.98% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Armenians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from Ukraine (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (3.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Arab (3.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Greece (3.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (3.0%, a difference of 0.20%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 62.9 /100 | #166 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #167 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 57.9 /100 | #168 | Average 3.0% |
| Arabs | 57.6 /100 | #169 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 56.9 /100 | #170 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 56.6 /100 | #171 | Average 3.0% |
| Armenians | 56.0 /100 | #172 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 51.1 /100 | #173 | Average 3.0% |
| Indonesians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 48.4 /100 | #175 | Average 3.0% |
| Panamanians | 47.0 /100 | #176 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 46.4 /100 | #177 | Average 3.0% |
| Japanese | 46.0 /100 | #178 | Average 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 43.1 /100 | #179 | Average 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |