Turkish vs Zimbabwean Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Turkish
Zimbabwean
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Turks
Zimbabweans
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Zimbabwean Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,627,212 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,189,225 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.689 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 4.3%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 0.49% | 0.34% |
| Maximum | 4.5% | 12.0% |
| Range | 4.0% | 11.7% |
| Mean | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Median | 2.2% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.61% | 1.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Zimbabweans by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Cypriot (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Cambodian (2.2%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Venezuela (2.2%, a difference of 0.63%), Bulgarian (2.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and Tongan (2.2%, a difference of 0.91%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Filipino (2.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Bolivia (2.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Bolivian (2.2%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Nepal (2.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and Sudanese (2.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.2% |