Turkish vs Burmese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Turkish
Burmese
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Turks
Burmese
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Burmese Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,163,307 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.216 and weighted average of 10.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,767,896 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.71%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Burmese |
Minimum | 3.5% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 20.6% | 43.5% |
Range | 17.1% | 41.8% |
Mean | 8.8% | 10.5% |
Median | 8.5% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 6.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Burmese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Romanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Poland (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Romanians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Burmese | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Ukrainians | 96.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.1% |