Tsimshian vs Kiowa Male Disability
COMPARE
Tsimshian
 Kiowa
 Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Tsimshian
Kiowa
15.6%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.4%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Kiowa Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,544 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,098,760 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 15.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tsimshian | Kiowa | 
| Minimum | 11.5% | 9.0% | 
| Maximum | 30.2% | 33.5% | 
| Range | 18.6% | 24.5% | 
| Mean | 19.7% | 19.3% | 
| Median | 22.4% | 18.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.7% | 15.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 24.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.3% | 8.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 5.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Kiowa by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Creek (15.5%, a difference of 0.45%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Creek (15.5%, a difference of 0.66%), Puerto Rican (15.6%, a difference of 0.79%), Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and Chickasaw (15.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 15.0%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 15.1%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 15.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 16.5%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 17.4%  |