Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Celtic Cognitive Disability
COMPARE
Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Celtic
Cognitive Disability
Cognitive Disability Comparison
Trinidadians and Tobagonians
Celtics
17.9%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.1%
COGNITIVE DISABILITY
74.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Celtic Cognitive Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,836,057 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Trinidadians and Tobagonians and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 17.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,858,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with cognitive disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 17.1%, a difference of 4.2%.
Cognitive Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Trinidadian and Tobagonian | Celtic |
Minimum | 7.9% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 29.8% | 50.0% |
Range | 21.9% | 48.7% |
Mean | 17.4% | 16.4% |
Median | 17.8% | 15.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.5% | 13.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 19.2% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.7% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.8% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 6.3% |
Similar Demographics by Cognitive Disability
Demographics Similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Trinidadians and Tobagonians are Immigrants from Thailand (17.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Jamaican (17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Samoan (17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), French American Indian (17.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Bangladesh (17.8%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Cheyenne | 1.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 17.8% |
Cajuns | 1.4 /100 | #239 | Tragic 17.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 17.8% |
Mexicans | 1.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 17.8% |
Paiute | 1.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 1.0 /100 | #243 | Tragic 17.8% |
Jamaicans | 0.9 /100 | #244 | Tragic 17.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.8 /100 | #245 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 0.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 17.9% |
Samoans | 0.7 /100 | #247 | Tragic 17.9% |
French American Indians | 0.7 /100 | #248 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cree | 0.7 /100 | #249 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.7 /100 | #250 | Tragic 17.9% |
Malaysians | 0.6 /100 | #251 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.6 /100 | #252 | Tragic 17.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Cognitive Disability
In terms of cognitive disability, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Latvia (17.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Australia (17.1%, a difference of 0.070%), American (17.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Yugoslavian (17.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Cognitive Disability |
Syrians | 83.0 /100 | #151 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 82.7 /100 | #152 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 17.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 79.3 /100 | #154 | Good 17.1% |
Brazilians | 78.9 /100 | #155 | Good 17.1% |
Sri Lankans | 78.9 /100 | #156 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Australia | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 17.1% |
Celtics | 74.1 /100 | #158 | Good 17.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 17.2% |
Australians | 72.4 /100 | #160 | Good 17.2% |
Americans | 72.2 /100 | #161 | Good 17.2% |
Yugoslavians | 71.6 /100 | #162 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 71.5 /100 | #163 | Good 17.2% |
Armenians | 70.1 /100 | #164 | Good 17.2% |
Immigrants | Albania | 64.9 /100 | #165 | Good 17.2% |