Tongan vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Bahamas
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Bahamas
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,442 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,634,972 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.35%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Bahamas |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 7.0% |
| Range | 11.7% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 3.0% |
| Median | 2.9% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.97% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.1% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Bahamas by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |