Tongan vs Immigrants from Cambodia Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Cambodia
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Cambodia
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
78.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
HEARING DISABILITY
64.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
164th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Cambodia Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,442 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 205,141,763 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.576 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Cambodia |
| Minimum | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 13.0% | 15.8% |
| Range | 11.7% | 14.4% |
| Mean | 3.3% | 4.9% |
| Median | 2.9% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.97% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 3.5% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Cambodia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Russia (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Cambodia are Immigrants from Central America (3.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (3.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Japan (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Albanian (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Fiji (2.9%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 69.6 /100 | #157 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 69.5 /100 | #158 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 67.4 /100 | #159 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 67.1 /100 | #160 | Good 2.9% |
| Albanians | 66.6 /100 | #161 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 66.3 /100 | #162 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 64.9 /100 | #163 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 64.8 /100 | #164 | Good 3.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 64.2 /100 | #165 | Good 3.0% |