Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Alaska Native
Immigrants from Bahamas
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Alaska Natives
Immigrants from Bahamas
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
80.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Bahamas Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 76,760,957 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,634,972 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 55.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaska Native | Immigrants from Bahamas |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.49% |
| Maximum | 18.5% | 7.0% |
| Range | 17.3% | 6.5% |
| Mean | 7.0% | 3.0% |
| Median | 6.7% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.6% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.4% | 1.1% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Alaska Natives by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Alaska Natives are Chickasaw (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.7%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and Navajo (4.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 5.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Laotian (2.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Congo (2.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Brazilian (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tongan (2.9%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |