Swiss vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vision Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Swiss
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
55.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
37.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,374,244 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,315,861 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 0.83% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 3.7% |
| Range | 9.6% | 2.9% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.47% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 0.62% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 0.62% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Scandinavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Canada (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |