Swiss vs Costa Rican Vision Disability
COMPARE
Swiss
Costa Rican
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Swiss
Costa Ricans
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
55.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
40.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
182nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Costa Rican Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,374,244 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,497,093 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 0.95%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 0.39% | 0.38% |
| Maximum | 9.9% | 8.8% |
| Range | 9.6% | 8.4% |
| Mean | 2.6% | 2.1% |
| Median | 2.1% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 0.84% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Costa Ricans by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Lebanese (2.2%, a difference of 0.090%), South American Indian (2.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Northern European (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Scandinavian (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and Immigrants from Canada (2.2%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from North America (2.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Oceania (2.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Immigrants | England | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 62.6 /100 | #167 | Good 2.1% |
| Brazilians | 62.2 /100 | #168 | Good 2.1% |
| South American Indians | 57.4 /100 | #169 | Average 2.2% |
| Swiss | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 2.2% |
| Lebanese | 54.3 /100 | #171 | Average 2.2% |
| Northern Europeans | 50.1 /100 | #172 | Average 2.2% |
| Scandinavians | 50.0 /100 | #173 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 47.6 /100 | #175 | Average 2.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
| Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
| Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
| Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |