Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Kenya Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from Kenya
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from Kenya
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
83.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
86.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from Kenya Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,755,219 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.365 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,040,031 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kenya and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.044 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.54%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from Kenya |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 11.9% | 8.1% |
| Range | 10.6% | 7.0% |
| Mean | 3.5% | 3.2% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.6% | 3.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.57% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 1.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 1.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from Kenya by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kenya are Chilean (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |