Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Lithuania
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Lithuania
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
73.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Lithuania Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,714,489 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Lithuania |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 5.7% |
| Range | 28.7% | 3.5% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 3.3% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.78% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 0.86% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 0.85% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Lithuania by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Lithuania are Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Palestinian (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Panama (2.9%, a difference of 0.50%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |