Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Poland Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Poland
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Poland
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
70.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Poland Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,813,024 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Poland and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 2.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Poland |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 0.95% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 20.5% |
| Range | 28.7% | 19.6% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 4.7% |
| Median | 2.8% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Poland by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Subsaharan African (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Poland are Costa Rican (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Sudanese (2.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Lithuania (2.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from France (2.9%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 79.2 /100 | #144 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 78.9 /100 | #145 | Good 2.9% |
| Brazilians | 78.7 /100 | #146 | Good 2.9% |
| Tongans | 78.6 /100 | #147 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 77.7 /100 | #148 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 76.9 /100 | #149 | Good 2.9% |
| Palestinians | 73.6 /100 | #150 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 73.0 /100 | #152 | Good 2.9% |
| Sudanese | 72.1 /100 | #153 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 71.5 /100 | #154 | Good 2.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 71.4 /100 | #155 | Good 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 70.2 /100 | #156 | Good 2.9% |