Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Zaire Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Zaire
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Zaire
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
88.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Zaire Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,283,716 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,252,507 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zaire and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.830 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.97%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Zaire |
| Minimum | 1.0% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 29.8% | 12.6% |
| Range | 28.7% | 11.1% |
| Mean | 4.0% | 3.5% |
| Median | 2.8% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.1% | 3.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 0.68% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 2.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Zaire by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Soviet Union (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zaire are Bahamian (2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Albania (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Liberian (2.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Cuban (2.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Sudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Jordanians | 89.5 /100 | #120 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Cubans | 89.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Liberians | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 2.8% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% |
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% |