Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Soviet Union
Immigrants from Northern Africa
5.8%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
98.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
88th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,487,843 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,147,957 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.311 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 0.82%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Soviet Union | Immigrants from Northern Africa |
Minimum | 2.6% | 2.5% |
Maximum | 10.8% | 12.9% |
Range | 8.2% | 10.4% |
Mean | 5.3% | 6.0% |
Median | 5.7% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 6.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 1.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Demographics Similar to Soviet Union and Immigrants from Northern Africa by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Chile (5.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Latvian (5.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Australian (5.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and South American (5.7%, a difference of 0.14%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Africa are Immigrants from Cameroon (5.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Brazilian (5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Peru (5.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from South Africa (5.7%, a difference of 0.060%), and Sudanese (5.7%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Peru | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Brazilians | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.3 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Sudanese | 99.3 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.3 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Somalis | 99.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Chileans | 99.2 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.2 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.2 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Palestinians | 99.2 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Ugandans | 99.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 5.7% |
South Americans | 99.0 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Latvians | 99.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.9 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Soviet Union | 98.9 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Bhutanese | 98.8 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 5.8% |
Australians | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 5.8% |